1. Havrilesky's
main insight about Mad Men is that
the show, and its characters, reflect the discontent of the American public due
to the birth of advertising. In the first three paragraphs, Heavrilesky
discusses Americans constant need to have the next best thing, their
dissatisfaction with what they have, and this caused unhappiness in the
American public. She provides this background detail to set up her analysis of Mad Men. Specific passages that reflect
this are, “…underscoring the disconnect between American dream and reality by
distilling our deep-seated frustrations as a nation into painfully palpable
vignettes.” (p. 171), “The ambition and conflicted desires of these characters
in their pursuit of happiness is what makes Mad
Men such a singular and resonant reflection of a particularly American
puzzle.” (p. 174), and the last paragraph, especially “the birth of the
advertising age coincides directly with the birth oh our discontent as a
nation…” (p. 175).
2. The
footnote says that Havrilesky is the television critic at Salon, so that gives her credibility. Her job is to critique
television shows, so it is assumed that she is objective and educated on
television. In the article, Havrilesky establishes authority to write about Mad Men and have people believe her by
being informed about the show. Her summaries of the plots and the characters
are clear, informed, and insightful. She also references the show’s creator,
which gives her authority.
3. Havrilesky
mostly appeals to the reader’s emotions in the opening three paragraphs when
she is describing the Americans’ discontent. For example, “It’s a sickness that’s infused in out blood,
a dissatisfaction with the ordinary that’s instilled in us from childhood.”,
“Slowly we come to view our own lives as inconsequential, grubby, even
intolerable.” and “…millions of aspiring 3-year old princesses hum ‘Someday my
prince will come!’”
4. I
had not seen Mad Men before reading
the essay, but having read it, yes I do understand the basic premise of the
show-it follows an ad agency in 1960’s New York. Havrilesky did make me want
watch the show a little bit because the way she described the characters was
intriguing.
No comments:
Post a Comment